Course evaluation
Course links and QR codes collect participant identity, ratings, comments, and declaration as structured data.
Credential evidence
GTF uses structured course evaluations, renewal submissions, and Level 1 to Level 4 evidence records to decide whether trainer credentials remain active.
System flow
Every evidence record should connect to a trainer member, client or course, cohort, date, and review status. GTF should rely first on documentary evidence, structured assessment data, and verifiable links. Trainer Quality Council review is reserved for disputes, appeals, unclear evidence, complaints, or badge misuse.
Course links and QR codes collect participant identity, ratings, comments, and declaration as structured data.
Members submit client confirmations, learning cases, transfer cases, one outcome case, peer review, and rating-floor evidence.
Reviewers separate Level 1 participant response from Level 2 learning, Level 3 workplace transfer, and Level 4 outcome evidence.
Level 1 to Level 4
Shows how participants rated course relevance, materials, trainer engagement, confidence, and recommendation intent.
Shows what participants learned through quiz results, assignments, demonstrations, reflections, or scored practice.
Shows whether participants used the learning at work through action plans, manager feedback, behavior checklists, or follow-up cases.
Shows a client-confirmed result, business metric, operational improvement, or sponsor statement with assumptions declared.
Annual renewal
First-year credentialing may consider existing data submitted on trust basis. Renewal must depend on evidence from GTF systems or an approved equivalent assessment system.
Documentary evidence
Use the strongest available documents. Screenshots can support a record, but structured exports, client confirmations, signed records, and evidence links carry more weight.