Participant evaluation
Shows how participants rated course relevance, materials, trainer engagement, confidence, and recommendation intent.
Training impact evidence
GTF separates evidence into four levels so buyers and reviewers can see whether a record proves participant response, learning, workplace use, or business outcome.
Level 1 to Level 4
Each level answers a different question. A strong trainer record should not rely only on participant satisfaction when higher-value engagements require learning, transfer, and outcome evidence.
Shows how participants rated course relevance, materials, trainer engagement, confidence, and recommendation intent.
Shows what participants learned through quiz results, assignments, demonstrations, reflections, or scored practice.
Shows whether participants used the learning at work through action plans, manager feedback, behavior checklists, or follow-up cases.
Shows a client-confirmed result, business metric, operational improvement, or sponsor statement with assumptions declared.
How GTF uses the ladder
The ladder helps buyers ask for the right proof. A simple workshop may need Level 1 evidence, while a strategic engagement should show transfer or outcome evidence.
The ladder gives trainers a clear path to build renewal evidence from course evaluations into stronger cases over time.
The ladder lets GTF separate satisfaction claims from learning, application, and outcome claims during credential renewal.